This segment addresses the general principles and presumptive validity of international arbitral awards.

This segment addresses the presumptive validity and preclusive effects of international arbitral awards, particularly choice-of-law issues.

This segment addresses the presumptive validity and preclusive effects of international arbitral awards, and forums for annulment of international arbitral awards.

This segment addresses the forums and grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the ground of no valid arbitration agreement, part 1 of 2.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the ground of no valid arbitration agreement, part 2 of 2.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of no valid arbitration agreement and excess of authority.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of excess of authority and lack of opportunity to present its case.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of lack of opportunity to present case and agreed arbitral procedures.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of agreed arbitral procedures and law of arbitral seat.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of the arbitrator’s lack of impartiality.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of arbitrator’s lack of impartiality and public policy.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of public policy, non-arbitrability, and fraud.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the grounds of fraud, and expansive annulment grounds.

This segment addresses the grounds for annulments of international arbitral awards, particularly the expansive annulment grounds and less expansive annulment grounds.

This segment addresses less expansive annulment grounds, agreements waiving the right to seek annulment of arbitral awards, agreements for heightened judicial scrutiny of arbitral awards, and future directions.

This segment addresses the general principles and jurisdictional requirements for the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards, including the requirements of “arbitral award” and “arising out of differences.”

This segment addresses the jurisdictional requirements for the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards, including the requirements of “commercial relationship” and “defined legal relationship” and “foreign and non-domestic award.”

This segment addresses the jurisdictional requirements for the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards, particularly reciprocity.

This segment provides a summary of the jurisdictional requirements for the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards, as well as proof of international arbitral awards under the New York Convention.

This segment addresses the proof of international arbitral awards under national arbitration legislation, as well as the presumptive validity of international arbitral awards under the New York Convention.

This segment addresses the presumptive validity of international arbitral awards under the New York Convention, national arbitration legislation, and the grounds for denying recognition and enforcement under Article V(1)(a), particularly the lack of a valid arbitration agreement.

This segment addresses the ground for denying recognition and enforcement under Article V(1)(a) due to the lack of a valid arbitration agreement, part 1 of 2.

This segment addresses the ground for denying recognition and enforcement under Article V(1)(a) due to the lack of a valid arbitration agreement, part 2 of 2.